Senate Support for U.S. Export-Import Bank is Big Win for the 1%

Date: May 15, 2012

WASHINGTON, DC – Today the U.S. Senate passed H.R. 2072, a bill to reauthorize the federal government’s Export-Import Bank (Ex-Im Bank), which provides billions of dollars in public financing for harmful fossil fuel projects worldwide.[1]   Passage of the bill will allow the agency to increase its portfolio cap from $100 billion to $140 billion., and it now moves to President Obama’s desk to sign into law.

The passage of the Ex-Im Bank reauthorization bill omits environmental, social and some anti-corruption reforms necessary to hold the agency accountable for the damage done by the projects it finances.[2]  The bill’s omission of public interest reforms comes despite earlier passage of a Senate Banking Committee version of the bill with language promoting more renewable energy, and a previously-passed House Financial Services version that would have established an independent accountability mechanism to address the growing number of severe violations of the agency’s environmental and social policies.

“By passing today’s Ex-Im Bank reauthorization, the Senate ensured that some of the country’s most profitable and polluting companies, like ExxonMobil, will continue to enjoy billions of dollars in public subsidies, leaving behind them a wake of damaged environments and harmed communities,” said Doug Norlen, Policy Director at Pacific Environment.

However, two provisions of the bill could draw more public attention to Ex-Im Bank fossil fuel projects.  The first is a provision that requires public notice and comment for any Ex-Im Bank transaction exceeding $100 million, which will cover many Ex-Im Bank fossil fuel projects.  The second is a requirement for the U.S. to initiate and pursue negotiations with other countries’ export credit agencies to substantially reduce, with the ultimate goal of eliminating, subsidized export financing programs and other forms of export subsidies.  Many export credit agencies subsidize fossil fuel projects.

“When negotiating to end export financing subsidies, the Obama Administration should start by cutting the Ex-Im Bank’s bloated support for fossil fuel projects,” said Michelle Chan, Economic Policy Director of Friends of the Earth. “This would go a long way towards demonstrating that the U.S. is serious about Obama’s G20 pledge to phase out fossil fuel subsidies.”

Environmentalists point out that the Senate passage of the Ex-Im Bank reauthorization bill does nothing to curb the agency’s skyrocketing support for fossil fuel projects, which surpassed $4.5 billion in 2011, six times as much as for renewable energy.  Moreover, an amendment introduced by Sen. Bennet, calling on Ex-Im Bank to increase renewable energy financing, and to identify barriers to doing so, was defeated.

“The Republicans’ failure to approve previously agreed-upon clean energy and accountability reforms keeps the Ex-Im Bank hopelessly stuck in the past and cedes U.S. market share, jobs, and competitiveness in the clean energy race, “said Justin Guay, Washington Representative of the Sierra Club’s International Finance Program.

“It’s bad enough that the Obama Administration pawns publicly-owned coal for export, and seriously entertains approval of the tar sands pipeline.  Now it is complicit in an Export-Import Bank reauthorization bill without any requirement to clean up the agency’s portfolio. It’s as if the Obama Administration wants to push climate pollution,” said Kyle Ash, Senior Legislative Representative, Greenpeace.


[2]  These reforms were presented in testimony by Pacific Environment’s Policy Director, Doug Norlen, before a Senate subcommittee hearing on Export-Import Bank reauthorization, available at

Pacific Environment * Friends of the Earth * Greenpeace * Sierra Club