Conservation Organizations Urge Thorough Review of Arctic Drilling
Photo credit: CC0, via Pixabay
Shell’s many technical and decision-making problems warrant credible analysis.
In a letter sent to Interior’s Acting Assistant Secretary for Land and Minerals Management Tommy Beaudreau today, thirteen conservation groups ask that a review of Shell’s 2012-2013 Arctic drilling examine the entire system of Arctic Ocean drilling.
“To ensure that the review is as credible and comprehensive as possible, we recommend that Interior evaluate the entire system involved in Arctic Ocean drilling including the transportation, logistics, and drilling components,” the letter states. “This involves working with other agencies (e.g., the U.S. Coast Guard) and outside experts.”
The U.S. Department of the Interior announced the review earlier this month and said it would pay special attention to difficulties Shell encountered including those involving its response vessel, the Arctic Challenger; deployment of its oil spill containment dome; and operational issues associated with its two drilling rigs, the Noble Discoverer and the Kulluk.
“It’s critical that Interior’s review be complete and objective, and that its recommendations flow from the facts. Unfortunately for Shell and Arctic Ocean drilling in general, this past season’s transportation and drilling problems are not favorable,” stated engineer and Arctic Program Director Lois Epstein of The Wilderness Society.
Today’s letter to Beaudreau asks for a thorough assessment of regulatory and plan approval inadequacies and instances of non-compliance, identification of safety system deficiencies, information on the conditions of Shell’s drilling rigs after the drilling season, information on the custom-designed tug whose engines failed during rough seas, and an analysis of the likelihood of a similar-scale response effort in the Arctic.
Additionally, the letter requests that Interior make the review process transparent including meeting with key independent experts in open session. The conservation community also requests that preliminary findings be shared at a public hearing in Anchorage, and that the review’s timeframe be expanded if needed to ensure thoroughness.
Contacts:Colleen Keane, (206) 734-9300, ckeane@pacificenvironment.orgLois Epstein, (907) 272-9453, ext. 107, lois_epstein@tws.orgGwen Dobbs, (602) 266-0418, gwen@alaskawild.org
This site uses cookies and similar technologies to improve your experience and analyze traffic. We may share site data with trusted partners for relevant content and ads. Manage your preferences or opt out anytime. For more information, read our Privacy Statement below.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
